Why Conflict Resolution Works

December 24, 2016

A lot of systems have been devised to help people take control of interpersonal conflict with the aim of facilitating positive, win-win outcomes. But, is there an underlying essence common to successful conflict resolution techniques? Let’s compare six systematized approaches to conflict resolution, looking for commonalities.

Introducing Six Conflict De-escalation Methods

  • I-Statements
  • Nonviolent Communication
  • Active Listening 
  • Conflict Resolution
  • Kingian Nonviolence


I-Statements are commonly taught to young children as a positive way to deal with conflicts. They encourage clarity and assertion. There are variations, but the basic format is:

“I feel ______ when (you) ______ and I want ______.” A slightly more sophisticated version includes a reason for the feeling, as in, “I feel ______ when (you) ______ because ______ and I want/would like ______.”

I-Statements are designed to avoid blaming, which is thought to be counter-productive. They are also indicative of a U.S. culture that emphasizes building self-esteem and getting what you want as an individual regardless of the group good.

Nonviolent Communication

Nonviolent Communication (NVC), developed by psychologist Marshall Rosenberg, takes the basic format of an I-Statement and adds an emphasis on basic human needs. The formula becomes:

“When I see that ______ (an objective observation), I feel ______ because my need for ______ is (or isn’t) being met. Would you be willing to ______?”

With both I-Statements and NVC, it is crucial to follow “I feel” with an actual feeling (sad, happy, etc.) as opposed to the word “that,” as in, “I feel that you are being unfair,” etc. Some see NVC as an almost magical formula for de-escalating conflict and reaching understanding; some recoil at the artificiality of its construct. 

Nonviolent Communication also goes a step beyond simple I-Statements in its formula for eliciting the feelings and perhaps unmet needs of the other, as in:

“You sound ______ (feeling). Is it because when I ______, your need for ______ isn’t (is) being met? What would you like me to do?”

The exact construction isn’t critical. What NVC focuses on are four components: observations, feelings, needs and requests, for yourself and for others with whom you may be in conflict.

Active Listening

Active Listening is a set of techniques to help an individual understand another and convey that understanding. It can help to de-escalate emotionally charged conflict. While there are many methods of Active Listening, the basics involve:

  • Silencing oneself while listening to the other
  • Paying attention to the meaning conveyed by the body language of the speaker
  • Intentional body language of the listener to convey interest
  • Reflecting back to the speaker to ensure correct understanding
  • Asking any needed clarifying questions

It’s an other-centered way to remove one’s own agenda and focus on genuine understanding. 

LARA and its variation, CLARA

LARA stands for Listen, Affirm, Respond, Add (information). CLARA adds Calm (yourself) to the recipe. It’s a simple on-the-fly Active Listening method for conflict de-escalation. The Add step moves beyond strict Active Listening to allow a respectful dialogue to occur. 

Conflict Resolution

Conflict Resolution is any of a number of techniques designed for people to reach win-win outcomes in interpersonal conflict. Unlike the previous methods to de-escalate and solve conflict, Conflict Resolution requires both parties to work together in accordance with a chosen methodology.

When I taught elementary school students, I adapted standard conflict resolution elements to create the ABCDEF model:

A – Find out what the problem is About

B – Brainstorm solutions

C – Choose one solution

D – Do it

E – Evaluate its success

F – Friends again

If the solution is not successful in achieving a win-win outcome, a different solution is chosen. The last step, Friends Again, was inspired by Kingian Nonviolence’s emphasis on Reconciliation (see below).

Kingian Nonviolence

Kingian Nonviolence is a set pf principles and steps to resolve conflict, especially between groups of people. It is derived from the writings of Martin Luther King Jr. and the experiences of the Civil rights Movement.

There are six principles to live and abide by while engaging in six steps in Kingian nonviolent conflict resolution:


  • Nonviolence is a way of life for courageous people.
  • The Beloved Community is the Framework for the Future.
  • Fight the forces of evil, not the people doing evil.
  • Accept suffering without retaliation for the cause, to achieve the goal.
  • Avoid internal violence of the spirit, as well as external, physical violence.
  • The universe is on the side of justice


  • Information gathering
  • Education
  • personal commitment
  • Negotiation
  • Direct Action
  • Reconciliation

The concept of the Beloved Community was central to Dr. King’s vision of the future. It envisions a world in which everyone is included and afforded the freedom to live up to their full human potential. For this to take place, reconciliation must be worked towards in any campaign for social justice.

What the Six Methods Share 

I-Statements, Nonviolent Communication, Active Listening, and techniques such as LARA/CLARA, Conflict Resolution and Kingian Nonviolence all require a self awareness that can only come from stepping back from the emotional grip of a problem to allow for rational analysis. 

With I-Statements, we need to step outside our feelings enough to name them, to see them as they are, understand their origin, and then to ask for something. Nonviolent Communication has the same underlying requirement; it requires a degree of emotional detachment in order to objectively work on a problem. With Active Listening techniques such as LARA/CLARA, we need to remove ourselves from our own emotions long enough to be other-centered. This allows for clearer thinking. The same is true for conflict resolution techniques, which normally also deploy calming techniques, such as deep breathing, before a problem is tackled. 

Calming down the limbic system, the part of the brain that deals most directly with survival-based emotions, and relying instead on the higher functions of the prefrontal cortex allows people to take control of problems in a constructive way. This is the benefit of all of these methods to resolve interpersonal conflict; all of them activate the parts of our brains best suited to creative problem solving.

This is not to say that conflict resolution and reconciliation are anti-emotion. Rather, emotions are recognized, accepted and used to humanize one another in honest communication. Strong emotions bring conflict to our attention. They are like a messenger. We accept the message and use it to understand the conflict. But the messenger doesn’t solve the conflict. For that we need a set of analytical skills that are independent of emotions.

The various conflict de-escalation and reconciliation programs listed above may seem artificial, even unnatural; people may balk at using any sort of script to communicate. But that very artificiality may help to move ones center of awareness from the limbic system to the prefrontal cortex. They all provide a framework that lets the prefrontal cortex get to work on the problem. The differences between them are far less important than their commonality: They let us know that we don’t have to be at the mercy of circumstances, that we can take control of our lives through intentional work that promises to create a safer, more interconnected world… a Beloved Community.

A look back at an article I wrote in 2013 about bombing Syria:


Stand Up and Be Discounted (is the name of this blog post)

October 24, 2016

Just like the @ sign for “at,” there should be signs for “before” and “after,” something like this: and

new-note-3 andnew-note-2

Here is some Trump Haiku:


This Haiku is rigged

It is against Donald Trump

It is so unfair


Whatever I said

Whatever I may have done

It is all her fault


All of your problems

Are caused by a foreign group

Who look down at you

And some Clinton Haiku, too!


It is just my turn

Donald would destroy the world

Nothing can stop me


I can do this job

My opponent is a Smurf

A dangerous Smurf


I am on your side

I advocate for children

Please don’t read my mail

Silly things about TV shows:

  • Nobody ever waits for their coffee to cool down before drinking it.
  • No one says “Goodbye” when they hang up the phone.
  • People don’t like to face one another when talking to each other; they generally stand side by side.
  • On The Flash, Cisco & Caitlin keep loose paper on their desk for the sole purpose of it blowing into the air every time the Flash runs off. You’d think after a couple of years of this, they’d get a paper weight.
  • If it’s a show from the BBC or a superhero show (other than Luke Cage), most everybody is white except the boyfriend/girlfriend.
  • Children can be replaced with completely different children and not even their parents notice (examples include Monk, Frasier & Modern Family).

And now, a daisy which, if you click it, will take you somewhere:


Three Poems. Not Two. Not Even Four, But Three.

October 21, 2016

Rotten Teeth

They give up their teeth

They give up their jobs

And their children

They defend their ego

“Take my teeth,” they say

He misses his 12 children

A new baby will grow up

With dad in an endless time out.


It’s the system, not their fault.

They got screwed. It’s unfair.

But this time it will be different.

This is the last time.

They gave away their rotten teeth.

The Eyes of God

When I see with love

Those are the eyes of God seeing through me

Living Bridge

I will melt into this poem

And emerge with the truth

A bridge from rock to God;

No longer shall I phase between the shadows

I shall build my home

of rock and spirit

And fill it with real things

And now a flower, in case you want to go there:


Why I’m Not Voting 3rd Party

October 17, 2016


I’m a big supporter of the Green Party; I’ve attended Green Party meetings and voted for Green Party candidates, even in Presidential elections. I’ve always believed that you should vote your conscience if you ever want anything to change.

However, we have a winner-take-all system of elections. We don’t have a parliamentary system that would allow 4% of Congress to be Green if 4% of us voted for the Green Party. Instead, if 4% of us vote Green, the government could be taken over by Donald Trump and a band of alt-right extremists.

We should have a parliamentary system. We should have instant run-off elections, where voters are free to vote for a third party knowing that if it doesn’t get a majority, their 2nd choice candidate will receive their vote. We should also get rid of the electoral college. These are all reforms that third parties should fight for. But they have to do it from local and state offices and sometimes, although extremely difficult, US congressional offices.

The system has to be reformed, but it can’t be reformed if we are putting our energies and votes into the Presidential race where we may end up feeling good about our individual vote while living in an increasingly repressive country where the reforms we seek slip further and further away.

Until we have a proportional democracy, where we could build a stronger presence in Congress year after year, it makes no sense to vote for a third party for President. Because let’s face it, there’s a big difference between a Clinton presidency, that may be mediocre and supportive of the status quo, and the chaos of a Trump presidency.

One could make the argument that by helping to throw the election to Trump, we would force the Democrats to pay more attention to the issues important to, say the Green party in order for them to win those voters back. But, regardless of whether the Democrats actually took that lesson to heart, I just don’t agree with the morality of punishing the Democrats by punishing the entire world with a Trump regime.

I have to admit that my decision has been made easier this time around because I find the third party candidates much less compelling, and even less able to articulate their party’s platforms, than in previous years. But even if someone with a consistent message I agreed with, such as Ralph Nader were running, I don’t think that I could take the risk this time. It’s just too scary. Every election, we are told that this is the most important election in our lifetimes by the candidates, in order to drum up enthusiasm. But this time, it’s true.

And now for something completely different (click):


Daisybrain Rates Super Hero TV Shows

October 12, 2016


Like all of America, I have been trained since birth to watch and enjoy super hero movies and TV shows. Here are six currently available on Netflix and/or iTunes. I have rated them, in case you just came into existence and haven’t seen them for yourself, or are incapable of forming your own opinion.

Let’s start with the worst & work our way to the best!

Read the rest of this entry »

The Universe Demands to Know What it is

September 24, 2016


I exploded. I don’t remember anything before that. I was energy. I was matter and energy. I’ve had lots of smaller explosions since, but nothing as big as that first one. And now, here I am, thinking about it. My consciousness isn’t centered in just this one head of mine. I think I have different pieces of the puzzle of what I am in minds scattered all over.

Read the rest of this entry »


September 9, 2016


There’s some kind of leak between my dreams and my so-called reality. It used to be one way, the normal way: bits and pieces of my life show up randomly in dreams. You know, your dog is in your dream, giving you advice, and she’s also your mother. But ever since April 13th, dream-stuff has been appearing in my waking world. For example, as I am writing this, I’m sitting in a café in Vermont, and on the chalk-written menu is raisin-flavored kombucha. Yes, Vermont is full of the hippy probiotic drink kombucha. But nobody really makes raison-flavored kombucha. It’s something I dreamed last night, along with the kombucha-flavored, vegan, raw chocolate cream pie, which I just noticed is also on display here in this café. It makes me wonder what else I’m seeing that I forget I dreamed up.

Read the rest of this entry »

%d bloggers like this: